CVE-2026-104051: PictShare < 3.7.1 Sensitive Information Disclosure via info API
Advisory generated from the CVE record, CISA, Exploit Observer and VEDAS: what it is, whether it is exploited, who is affected, and how to fix and detect it.
Generated by VEDAS. Scores as of 2026-11-04 15:41 UTC. Rebuilt every few hours from cve-scores, CISA KEV and vedas-signatures. How this works and its limits.
What it is
PictShare before 3.7.1 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain the secret delete_code and uploader metadata by calling the API::info() endpoint which returns the complete raw metadata object without a field whitelist. Attackers can use the publicly visible file hash to retrieve the delete_code via the info API and then invoke the delete API to permanently delete arbitrary files, while also exposing uploader IP, User Agent, remote port, and SHA-1 hash, resulting in loss of content integrity, availability, and uploader privacy.
Description quoted from the CVE record (assigned by VulnCheck, published 2026-10-01).
Weakness: Insufficiently Protected Credentials
How it can be exploited
Exploitable over the network with low attack complexity with no special attack requirements needing no privileges and no user interaction. Impact: confidentiality low, integrity none, availability high. CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CISA assessment (SSVC): CISA has no evidence of exploitation. Automatable: yes. Technical impact: partial.
Public exploit evidence (Exploit Observer)
Exploit Observer found 4 code repositories naming this CVE.
Code repositories that name a CVE are often scanners, copies or fakes, and some are malware. Read the code before running anything.
See all 7 references on Exploit Observer
Live scores
- EPSS
- 0.005
low predicted chance of attack - VEDAS
- 0.985
strong exploit evidence - On CISA KEV
- Not listed
- Detection rule
- Suricata
Who is affected
| Product | Affected | Not affected |
|---|---|---|
| HaschekSolutions pictshare | from 2.0.0 before 3.7.1 | Not stated |
Version ranges exactly as the CVE record states them. “Before X” means X is the first fixed version.
How to fix it
Fixed versions stated in the CVE record: 3.7.1.
Vendor guidance:
- Patch Commit (issue-tracking, release-notes)
- Vendor Patch (patch)
How to detect it
Suricata rules (network detection)
1 rule that alert on traffic matching this exploit: VEDAS CVE-2026-104051 PictShare - Unauthenticated Information Disclosure via info API. Add them to your Suricata rule set and reload.
Show the rules
# CVE-2026-104051 - PictShare (< 3.7.1) unauthenticated information disclosure (CWE-522). The
# API::info() endpoint (GET /api/info/<hash>) returns the raw getMetadataOfHash() object with no
# field whitelist, leaking the secret delete_code alongside the uploader ip, useragent, remote_port
# and sha1. Matches an HTTP response body that exposes delete_code together with the uploader
# remote_port and useragent fields, the combination returned only by the unfiltered info() object.
alert http $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"VEDAS CVE-2026-104051 PictShare - Unauthenticated Information Disclosure via info API"; flow:established,to_client; file.data; content:"delete_code"; nocase; fast_pattern; content:"remote_port"; nocase; content:"useragent"; nocase; classtype:web-application-attack; reference:cve,CVE-2026-104051; reference:url,https://www.exploit.observer/?keyword=CVE-2026-104051&match=exact; reference:url,https://subdomain.center/?engine=ammonites&keyword=pictshare&match=exact; sid:1092802; rev:1;)
CVE-2026-104051.rules on GitHub
References
Vendor advisories and patches
- Patch Commit (issue-tracking, release-notes)
- Vendor Patch (patch)
Technical analysis and advisories
- VulnCheck Advisory (third-party-advisory)
Other databases
Where this comes from
This advisory is generated automatically by VEDAS from: CVE.org record, cve-scores (EPSS and VEDAS), Exploit Observer, vedas-signatures. Text in quotes is reproduced from the source; everything else is a fixed template filled with source fields. Nothing here is written by a language model. Check the vendor advisory before acting, and read how VEDAS and Exploit Observer work, and their limits.