CVE-2026-12993: Apicurio/apicurio-registry: apicurio-registry: xml entity-expansion denial of service via internal dtd subset

Advisory generated from the CVE record, CISA, Exploit Observer and VEDAS: what it is, whether it is exploited, who is affected, and how to fix and detect it.

Generated by VEDAS. Scores as of 2026-11-08 00:03 UTC. Rebuilt every few hours from cve-scores, CISA KEV and vedas-signatures. How this works and its limits.

What it is

A flaw was found in Apicurio Registry. The DocumentBuilderAccessor correctly blocks external DTD and schema access but does not disable DOCTYPE declarations or enable FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING. An attacker with artifact-write permission can upload XML documents with internal entity-expansion payloads (billion-laughs variant) that cause CPU and heap exhaustion, partially mitigated by the JAXP default 64,000 entity-expansion limit.

Description quoted from the CVE record (assigned by redhat, published 2026-06-25).

Weakness: Improper Restriction of Recursive Entity References in DTDs

How it can be exploited

Exploitable over the network with low attack complexity needing low privileges and no user interaction. Impact: confidentiality none, integrity none, availability high. CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CISA assessment (SSVC): CISA has no evidence of exploitation. Automatable: no. Technical impact: partial.

Public exploit evidence (Exploit Observer)

Exploit Observer has no public exploit code naming this CVE. Check Exploit Observer for anything new.

Live scores

EPSS
0.005
low predicted chance of attack
VEDAS
0.970
strong exploit evidence
On CISA KEV
Not listed
Detection rule
No public rule yet

Who is affected

ProductAffectedNot affected
Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3.3.1 (apicurio/apicurio-registry-rhel8)Not statedNot stated
Red Hat build of Apicurio Registry 3.3.1 (apicurio/apicurio-registry-rhel9)Not statedNot stated

Version ranges exactly as the CVE record states them. “Before X” means X is the first fixed version.

How to fix it

Vendor guidance:

How to detect it

There is no open VEDAS detection rule for this bug yet. It is listed on the detection gaps page if CISA has confirmed attacks.

References

Vendor advisories and patches

Technical analysis and advisories

Other references

Other databases

Where this comes from

This advisory is generated automatically by VEDAS from: CVE.org record, cve-scores (EPSS and VEDAS), Exploit Observer. Text in quotes is reproduced from the source; everything else is a fixed template filled with source fields. Nothing here is written by a language model. Check the vendor advisory before acting, and read how VEDAS and Exploit Observer work, and their limits.

Supporting partners

Feasible SecurityAskealGoTrust