CVE-2026-41644: monetr is vulnerable to server-side request forgery in Lunch Flow link creation and refresh

Advisory generated from the CVE record, CISA, Exploit Observer and VEDAS: what it is, whether it is exploited, who is affected, and how to fix and detect it.

Generated by VEDAS. Scores as of 2026-11-01 19:19 UTC. Rebuilt every few hours from cve-scores, CISA KEV and vedas-signatures. How this works and its limits.

What it is

monetr is a budgeting application for recurring expenses. Prior to version 1.12.5, a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in monetr’s Lunch Flow integration allowed any authenticated user on a self-hosted instance to cause the monetr server to issue HTTP GET requests to arbitrary URLs supplied by the caller, with the response body from non-200 upstream responses reflected back in the API error message. This issue has been patched in version 1.12.5.

Description quoted from the CVE record (assigned by GitHub_M, published 2026-05-07).

Weakness: CWE-209: Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information; CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling; CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

How it can be exploited

Exploitable over the network with low attack complexity with no special attack requirements needing low privileges and no user interaction. Impact: confidentiality high, integrity none, availability low. CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:L/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N

CISA assessment (SSVC): CISA has no evidence of exploitation. Automatable: yes. Technical impact: partial.

Public exploit evidence (Exploit Observer)

Also known as: EUVD-2026-28353, GHSA-29v9-frvh-c426

VEDAS cluster: VEDAS:CROWSNEST

Exploit Observer links 3 pieces of public exploit code or detection modules that name this CVE or one of its aliases.

Exploit code and modules (3)

Code that names this CVE. A repository can be a working exploit, a scanner, a fake or malware; read it before running anything.

Vulnerability databases and vendor advisories (6)

Catalogue entries, not exploit evidence.

4 more references returned by Exploit Observer did not name this CVE or an alias, so they are left out.

VEDAS data as of 2026-11-01T17:12 UTC; fetched 2026-11-02.

Live scores

EPSS
0.003
low predicted chance of attack
VEDAS
0.974
strong exploit evidence
On CISA KEV
Not listed
Detection rule
Suricata

Who is affected

ProductAffectedNot affected
monetr monetrversion < 1.12.5Not stated

Version ranges exactly as the CVE record states them. “Before X” means X is the first fixed version.

Exploit Observer also maps it to: go github.com/monetr/monetr, monetr monetr.

How to fix it

No fixed version or vendor advisory is listed in the CVE record yet. Watch the vendor’s security page.

How to detect it

Suricata rules (network detection)

1 rule that alert on traffic matching this exploit: VEDAS CVE-2026-41644 monetr - Server-Side Request Forgery via Lunch Flow integration apiUrl to internal host. Add them to your Suricata rule set and reload.

Show the rules
suricata
alert http $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"VEDAS CVE-2026-41644 monetr - Server-Side Request Forgery via Lunch Flow integration apiUrl to internal host"; flow:established,to_server; http.method; content:"POST"; http.uri; content:"/api/lunch_flow"; nocase; fast_pattern; http.request_body; pcre:"/https?(?:\x3a|%3a)(?:\x2f\x2f|%2f%2f)(?:127\.|0\.0\.0\.0|localhost|169\.254\.169\.254|metadata|10\.|192\.168\.|172\.(?:1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[01])\.|\x5b|%5b)/i"; classtype:web-application-attack; reference:cve,CVE-2026-41644; reference:url,https://www.exploit.observer/?keyword=CVE-2026-41644&match=exact; reference:url,https://subdomain.center/?engine=ammonites&keyword=monetr&match=exact; sid:1096006; rev:1;)

CVE-2026-41644.rules on GitHub

References

Other references

Other databases

Where this comes from

This advisory is generated automatically by VEDAS from: CVE.org record, cve-scores (EPSS and VEDAS), Exploit Observer, vedas-signatures. Text in quotes is reproduced from the source; everything else is a fixed template filled with source fields. Nothing here is written by a language model. Check the vendor advisory before acting, and read how VEDAS and Exploit Observer work, and their limits.