CVE-2026-59097: Taiga < 6.10.2 - Unauthorized Due-Date Creation via API Viewsets
Advisory generated from the CVE record, CISA, Exploit Observer and VEDAS: what it is, whether it is exploited, who is affected, and how to fix and detect it.
Generated by VEDAS. Scores as of 2026-11-04 15:41 UTC. Rebuilt every few hours from cve-scores, CISA KEV and vedas-signatures. How this works and its limits.
What it is
Taiga before 6.10.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to create default due-date records in any project by exploiting unprotected POST endpoints on the user-story, task, and issue due-date API viewsets. Attackers can supply an arbitrary project identifier to these endpoints, which bypass permission checks and apply the AllowAny default, to pre-empt project administrators from initializing due dates by creating records before they can do so themselves.
Description quoted from the CVE record (assigned by VulnCheck, published 2026-07-02).
Weakness: Missing Authorization
How it can be exploited
Exploitable over the network with low attack complexity with no special attack requirements needing no privileges and no user interaction. Impact: confidentiality none, integrity low, availability none. CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CISA assessment (SSVC): CISA assesses that a public proof of concept exists. Automatable: yes. Technical impact: partial.
Public exploit evidence (Exploit Observer)
Exploit Observer found 5 code repositories naming this CVE.
Code repositories that name a CVE are often scanners, copies or fakes, and some are malware. Read the code before running anything.
See all 8 references on Exploit Observer
Live scores
- EPSS
- 0.004
low predicted chance of attack - VEDAS
- 0.985
strong exploit evidence - On CISA KEV
- Not listed
Who is affected
| Product | Affected | Not affected |
|---|---|---|
| taiga taiga-back | before 6.10.2 | Not stated |
Version ranges exactly as the CVE record states them. “Before X” means X is the first fixed version.
How to fix it
Fixed versions stated in the CVE record: 6.10.2.
Vendor guidance:
- Release Notes (release-notes)
- Fix Commit (patch)
How to detect it
Nuclei template (active check)
Taiga - Unauthenticated Default Due-Date Creation Missing Authorization
Taiga before 6.10.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the create_default action of the user-story, task and issue due-date API viewsets (routed at POST /api/v1/userstory-due-dates/create-default, /api/v1/task-due-dates/create-default and /api/v1/issue-due-dates/create-default). The action reads a client-supplied project_id and applies the AllowAny default without any permission check, so an unauthenticated remote attacker can create default due-date records in any project and pre-empt administrators from initializing due dates. This template sends an anonymous create-default request for project 1 and confirms the missing authorization by matching the handler-specific response (the created default due-date record or the “does already have due dates” guard message), both of which prove the request reached the handler without authentication; fixed builds add a permission check and reject anonymous callers with HTTP 403.
Name and description quoted from the template, written by VEDAS.
The template sends 1 request (POST /api/v1/userstory-due-dates/create-default); it decides using regex, status matchers. Severity in the template: medium. Marked as not yet verified against a live vulnerable target.
Run it against a host you own or are authorised to test:
nuclei -u https://your-host -t CVE-2026-59097.yamlShow the template (50 lines)
id: CVE-2026-59097
info:
name: "Taiga - Unauthenticated Default Due-Date Creation Missing Authorization"
author: vedas-arpsyndicate
severity: medium
description: |
Taiga before 6.10.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the create_default
action of the user-story, task and issue due-date API viewsets (routed at
POST /api/v1/userstory-due-dates/create-default, /api/v1/task-due-dates/create-default and
/api/v1/issue-due-dates/create-default). The action reads a client-supplied project_id and
applies the AllowAny default without any permission check, so an unauthenticated remote
attacker can create default due-date records in any project and pre-empt administrators from
initializing due dates. This template sends an anonymous create-default request for project 1
and confirms the missing authorization by matching the handler-specific response (the created
default due-date record or the "does already have due dates" guard message), both of which
prove the request reached the handler without authentication; fixed builds add a permission
check and reject anonymous callers with HTTP 403.
reference:
- https://www.exploit.observer/?keyword=CVE-2026-59097&match=exact
- https://subdomain.center/?engine=ammonites&keyword=taiga&match=exact
classification:
cvss-metrics: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
cvss-score: 6.9
cve-id: CVE-2026-59097
cwe-id: CWE-862
metadata:
verified: false
tags: cve,cve2026,taiga,auth-bypass,unauth
http:
- raw:
- |
POST /api/v1/userstory-due-dates/create-default HTTP/1.1
Host: {{Hostname}}
Content-Type: application/json
{"project_id":1}
matchers-condition: and
matchers:
- type: regex
part: body
regex:
- '(does already have [a-z ]*due dates|"days_to_due"|"by_default")'
- type: status
status:
- 200
- 201
- 400
Suricata rules (network detection)
1 rule that alert on traffic matching this exploit: VEDAS CVE-2026-59097 Taiga Unauthenticated Default Due-Date Creation Missing Authorization. Add them to your Suricata rule set and reload.
Show the rules
alert http $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HOME_NET any (msg:"VEDAS CVE-2026-59097 Taiga Unauthenticated Default Due-Date Creation Missing Authorization"; flow:established,to_server; http.method; content:"POST"; http.uri; content:"-due-dates/create-default"; fast_pattern; classtype:web-application-attack; reference:cve,CVE-2026-59097; reference:url,https://www.exploit.observer/?keyword=CVE-2026-59097&match=exact; reference:url,https://subdomain.center/?engine=ammonites&keyword=taiga&match=exact; sid:1096803; rev:1;)
CVE-2026-59097.rules on GitHub
References
Vendor advisories and patches
- Release Notes (release-notes)
- Fix Commit (patch)
Exploit code
- Researcher Disclosure (technical-description, exploit)
Technical analysis and advisories
- Fix PR (issue-tracking)
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/taiga-unauthorized-due-date-creation-via-api-viewsets (third-party-advisory)
Other databases
Where this comes from
This advisory is generated automatically by VEDAS from: CVE.org record, cve-scores (EPSS and VEDAS), Exploit Observer, vedas-signatures. Text in quotes is reproduced from the source; everything else is a fixed template filled with source fields. Nothing here is written by a language model. Check the vendor advisory before acting, and read how VEDAS and Exploit Observer work, and their limits.