CVE-2026-64849: MLflow Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability
Advisory generated from the CVE record, CISA, Exploit Observer and VEDAS: what it is, whether it is exploited, who is affected, and how to fix and detect it.
Generated by VEDAS. Scores as of 2026-11-01 19:19 UTC. Rebuilt every few hours from cve-scores, CISA KEV and vedas-signatures. How this works and its limits.
What it is
MLflow is an open source AI engineering platform for agents, large language models, and machine learning models. Starting in 3.3.0 and prior to 3.15.0, the unauthenticated POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{id}/test endpoint calls _validate_webhook_url() in mlflow/utils/validation.py only for the original URL while mlflow/webhooks/delivery.py follows redirects and re-resolves the hostname without pinning the validated address, allowing attackers to reach internal or cloud metadata services and receive response_status and response_body. This issue is fixed in version 3.15.0.
Description quoted from the CVE record (assigned by GitHub_M, published 2026-08-17).
Weakness: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
How it can be exploited
Exploitable over the network with low attack complexity needing no privileges and no user interaction. Impact: confidentiality high, integrity low, availability none. CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CISA assessment (SSVC): CISA assesses exploitation as active. Automatable: yes. Technical impact: partial.
- On CISA KEV since
- 2026-08-19
- US federal deadline
- 2026-09-02
- Ransomware use
- Not known
Public exploit evidence (Exploit Observer)
Also known as: BDU:2026-12002, EUVD-2026-60473, GHSA-7gwp-5pfp-969j, ZDI-26-846
VEDAS cluster: VEDAS:BARLEYBOBCAT
Exploit Observer links 11 pieces of public exploit code or detection modules that name this CVE or one of its aliases.
Exploit code and modules (11)
Code that names this CVE. A repository can be a working exploit, a scanner, a fake or malware; read it before running anything.
- Nuclei template: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectdiscovery/nuclei-templates/main/http/cves/2026/CVE-2026-64849.yaml
- Code repository: https://github.com/biutrap/cve-2026-64849
- Code repository: https://github.com/codeb0ssx/cve-2026-64849-poc
- Code repository: https://github.com/isaca0315/cve-2026-64849-poc-lab
- Code repository: https://github.com/maxprog-svg/cve-2026-64849
- Code repository: https://github.com/zavisco/cve-2026-64849.yaml
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/nuclei/2026/CVE-2026-64849.yaml
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/nuclei/2026/CVE-2026-64849.yaml
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/suricata/2026/CVE-2026-64849.rules
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/suricata/2026/CVE-2026-64849.rules
- Code repository: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ARPSyndicate/vedas-signatures/main/suricata/2026/CVE-2026-64849.rules
Research and write-ups (1)
- Research or write-up: https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-26-846
Vulnerability databases and vendor advisories (6)
Catalogue entries, not exploit evidence.
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/enisa/EUVD-2026-60473
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-7gwp-5pfp-969j
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64849
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2026-64849
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://osv.dev/vulnerability/GHSA-7gwp-5pfp-969j
- Vulnerability database or vendor advisory: https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-64849
News (1)
28 more references returned by Exploit Observer did not name this CVE or an alias, so they are left out.
VEDAS data as of 2026-11-01T17:12 UTC; fetched 2026-11-02.
Live scores
- EPSS
- 0.100
likely to be attacked soon - VEDAS
- 0.985
strong exploit evidence - On CISA KEV
- Yes, since 2026-08-19
Thin horizontal line: the “likely” (EPSS 0.10) or “strong” (VEDAS 0.90) threshold. Shaded “no data” areas are periods when cve-scores did not publish.
Who is affected
| Product | Affected | Not affected |
|---|---|---|
| mlflow mlflow | version >= 3.3.0, < 3.15.0 | Not stated |
Version ranges exactly as the CVE record states them. “Before X” means X is the first fixed version.
Exploit Observer also maps it to: lf_projects,_llc mlflow, lfprojects mlflow, pypi mlflow.
How to fix it
CISA required action: Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset’s internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
Vendor guidance:
- https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/pull/24258
- https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/issues/24179
- https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk
- https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-implementation-guidance-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64849
How to detect it
Nuclei template (active check)
Mlflow - Server-Side Request Forgery
MLflow is an open source AI engineering platform for agents, large language models, and machine learning models.
Name and description quoted from the template, written by VEDAS.
The template sends 3 requests (POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks, POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{{webhook_id}}/test, DELETE /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{{webhook_id}}); it confirms through an out-of-band callback (interactsh), so the scanner must be able to receive it; it decides using regex, word matchers. Severity in the template: critical. Marked as not yet verified against a live vulnerable target.
Run it against a host you own or are authorised to test:
nuclei -u https://your-host -t CVE-2026-64849.yamlShow the template (65 lines)
id: CVE-2026-64849
info:
name: "Mlflow - Server-Side Request Forgery"
author: vedas-arpsyndicate
severity: critical
description: |
MLflow is an open source AI engineering platform for agents, large language models, and machine learning
models.
reference:
- https://www.exploit.observer/?keyword=CVE-2026-64849&match=exact
- https://subdomain.center/?engine=ammonites&keyword=mlflow&match=exact
classification:
cvss-metrics: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
cvss-score: 9.3
cve-id: CVE-2026-64849
cwe-id: CWE-918
metadata:
verified: false
tags: cve,cve2026,mlflow,ssrf,oast,webhook,oss,vkev,kev
variables:
random: "{{rand_text_alpha(8)}}"
http:
- raw:
- |
POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks HTTP/1.1
Host: {{Hostname}}
Content-Type: application/json
{"name":"{{random}}","url":"https://{{interactsh-url}}","events":[{"entity":"REGISTERED_MODEL","action":"CREATED"}]}
- |
POST /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{{webhook_id}}/test HTTP/1.1
Host: {{Hostname}}
Content-Type: application/json
{"webhook_id":"{{webhook_id}}","event":{"entity":"REGISTERED_MODEL","action":"CREATED"}}
- |
DELETE /api/2.0/mlflow/webhooks/{{webhook_id}} HTTP/1.1
Host: {{Hostname}}
matchers-condition: and
matchers:
- type: word
part: body_1
words:
- "webhook_id"
- "ACTIVE"
condition: and
- type: word
part: interactsh_protocol
words:
- "http"
extractors:
- type: regex
name: webhook_id
part: body
internal: true
regex:
- '"webhook_id":\s*"([^"]+)"'
group: 1
Suricata rules (network detection)
1 rule that alert on traffic matching this exploit: VEDAS CVE-2026-64849 Mlflow - Server-Side Request Forgery. Add them to your Suricata rule set and reload.
Show the rules
alert http $EXTERNAL_NET any -> $HTTP_SERVERS $HTTP_PORTS (msg:"VEDAS CVE-2026-64849 Mlflow - Server-Side Request Forgery"; flow:established,to_server; http.uri; content:"webhooks"; nocase; http.request_body; content:"https://"; nocase; fast_pattern; classtype:web-application-attack; reference:cve,CVE-2026-64849; reference:url,https://www.exploit.observer/?keyword=CVE-2026-64849&match=exact; reference:url,https://subdomain.center/?engine=ammonites&keyword=mlflow&match=exact; sid:1010391; rev:1;)
CVE-2026-64849.rules on GitHub
References
Government sources
- https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-64849 (government-resource)
Other references
- https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7gwp-5pfp-969j (x_refsource_CONFIRM)
- https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/issues/24179 (x_refsource_MISC)
- https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/pull/24258 (x_refsource_MISC)
- https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/commit/ba949522477cbd5915aa55d29b0cfad7d5ddf939 (x_refsource_MISC)
- https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/releases/tag/v3.15.0 (x_refsource_MISC)
Other databases
Where this comes from
This advisory is generated automatically by VEDAS from: CVE.org record, CISA KEV, cve-scores (EPSS and VEDAS), Exploit Observer, vedas-signatures. Text in quotes is reproduced from the source; everything else is a fixed template filled with source fields. Nothing here is written by a language model. Check the vendor advisory before acting, and read how VEDAS and Exploit Observer work, and their limits.