IBM: every exploited CVE on CISA KEV
All 8 IBM bugs attackers are confirmed to be using, with attack scores and free detection rules.
Generated by VEDAS. Scores as of 2026-11-01 19:19 UTC. Rebuilt every few hours from cve-scores, CISA KEV and vedas-signatures. How this works and its limits.
8
IBM bugs on CISA’s exploited list
1 added in 2026.
2
are linked to ransomware
Every IBM vulnerability the US government has confirmed attackers are using, newest first, with each bug’s EPSS (predicted attack chance) and VEDAS (exploit evidence) scores and any free Nuclei or Suricata detection rule. US federal agencies must fix KEV-listed bugs by a deadline; everyone else should treat the list as “patch first”.
| Added | CVE | Product | Bug | EPSS | VEDAS | Detection rule | Ransomware |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-04 | CVE-2026-9198 | IBM Langflow | IBM Langflow Code Injection Vulnerability | 0.29 | 0.99 | Nuclei · Suricata | No |
| 2023-02-21 | CVE-2022-47986 | IBM Aspera Faspex | IBM Aspera Faspex Code Execution Vulnerability | 1.00 | 0.98 | Nuclei · Suricata | Yes |
| 2022-05-25 | CVE-2013-3993 | IBM InfoSphere BigInsights | IBM InfoSphere BigInsights Invalid Input Vulnerability | 0.05 | 0.53 | None yet | Yes |
| 2022-01-10 | CVE-2015-7450 | IBM WebSphere Application Server and Server Hypervisor Edition | IBM WebSphere Application Server and Server Hypervisor Edition Code Injection. | 0.98 | 0.99 | Nuclei · Suricata | No |
| 2021-11-03 | CVE-2020-4430 | IBM Data Risk Manager | IBM Data Risk Manager Directory Traversal Vulnerability | 0.69 | 0.93 | None yet | No |
| 2021-11-03 | CVE-2020-4428 | IBM Data Risk Manager | IBM Data Risk Manager Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 0.62 | 0.98 | Nuclei · Suricata | No |
| 2021-11-03 | CVE-2020-4427 | IBM Data Risk Manager | IBM Data Risk Manager Security Bypass Vulnerability | 0.70 | 0.98 | Nuclei · Suricata | No |
| 2021-11-03 | CVE-2019-4716 | IBM Planning Analytics | IBM Planning Analytics Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | 0.86 | 0.99 | Nuclei · Suricata | No |